NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q GPU
The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q design is a mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). Compared to the faster RTX 2000 GPUs (e.g. RTX 2060), the 1650 integrates no Raytracing or Tensor cores. Compared to the desktop version, the mobile and Max-Q versions use all 1024 shaders of the TU117 chip. It is designed for thin and light laptops and about 10-15% slower than a regular GTX 1650 for laptops (depending on the cooling capabilities). According to the specifications, the Max-Q variant clocks 20% slower for the base speed and 27% for the boost speed.
Beginning March 2020, the GTX 1650 Max-Q is also available with fast 4GB GDDR6 (N18P-G61).
The performance should be slightly faster than the old GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q.
The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal.
Compared to the bigger Turing chips (like the TU116 of the GTX 1660 Ti and the RTX lineup), the TU117 does not include the new NVENC encoder but an older one similar to the one used in Pascal and Volta.
Nvidia specifies a power consumption of 35 Watt TGP (Total Graphics Power) and therefore 15 Watts lower than a normal (Max-P) 1650 for laptops. Therefore, the Max-Q variant is well suited for thin and light laptops. The TU117 chip is manufactured in 12nm FFN at TSMC.
Benchmarks
Performance Rating – 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
…
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
…
3DMark – 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 2859 avg: 3130 median: 3070 (9%) max: 3494 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 2836 avg: 2998 median: 3016 (8%) max: 3238 Points
…
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
…
3DMark – 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 370469 avg: 377330 median: 373879 (44%) max: 391093 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 40461 avg: 62256 median: 59656 (8%) max: 86650 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 14259 avg: 20728 median: 20883 (23%) max: 29013 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 21759 avg: 39625 median: 45243.5 (12%) max: 53981 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 6300 avg: 7026 median: 7004.5 (12%) max: 7784 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 6985 avg: 7853 median: 7779 (9%) max: 8618 Points
3DMark – 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 40513 avg: 68009 median: 64975.5 (8%) max: 101571 Points
3DMark 11 – 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 9381 avg: 10635 median: 10471 (15%) max: 11966 Points
3DMark 11 – 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 10248 avg: 11171 median: 11082.5 (10%) max: 12259 Points
…
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
…
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb37_s153’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage – 3DM Vant. Perf. total
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb37_s154’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage – 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
…
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
…
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb4_s16’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>3DMark 06 3DMark 06 – Standard 1280×1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 31487 avg: 32041 median: 32040.5 (44%) max: 32594 Points
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb570_s1676’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 – specvp13 sw-04
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb570_s1674’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 – specvp13 snx-03
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb570_s1672’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 – specvp13 showcase-02
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb570_s1670’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 – specvp13 medical-02
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb570_s1668’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 – specvp13 maya-05
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb570_s1664’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 – specvp13 creo-02
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb570_s1662’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 – specvp13 catia-05
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb570_s1660’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 – specvp13 3dsmax-06
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb22_s38’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 – Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 5121 avg: 5968 median: 5967.5 (4%) max: 6814 points
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb62_s249’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 – Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb244_s707’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 – Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 85.3 avg: 110 median: 108.1 (28%) max: 143.6 fps
{element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});document.querySelectorAll(‘.sb244_s708’).forEach(element => {element.classList.toggle(‘hideEl’);});return false;”>Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 – Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
GFXBench – GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
GFXBench – GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit – LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit – LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
ComputeMark v2.1 – ComputeMark v2.1 Result
Power Consumption – Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 60 avg: 71.7 median: 73 (16%) max: 90.1 Watt
Power Consumption – Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.3818 avg: 0.4 median: 0.4 (44%) max: 0.485 Points per Watt
Clock Speed – GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
min: 1350 avg: 1378 median: 1389 (58%) max: 1395 MHz
– Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
Game Benchmarks
The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don’t have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1366×768
med. 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
QHD 2560×1440
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Performance 1920×1080
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×768
med. 1920×1080
high 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024×768
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1366×768
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024×768
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
4K 3840×2160
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024×768
med. 1366×768
high 1920×1080
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280×720
med. 1366×768
high 1366×768
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024×768
med. 1366×768
high 1366×768
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024×768
med. 1366×768
high 1366×768
ultra 1920×1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.22
log 18. 11:16:52
#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by “_”) +0s … 0s
#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s … 0s
#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Apr 2023 14:24:08 +0200 +0.001s … 0.001s
#3 composed specs +0.053s … 0.054s
#4 did output specs +0s … 0.054s
#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s … 0.054s
#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9834 +0.026s … 0.08s
#7 got single benchmarks 9834 +0.055s … 0.135s
#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s … 0.135s
#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.443s … 0.578s
#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s … 0.578s
#11 Got 471 rows for game benchmarks. +0.035s … 0.613s
#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s … 0.613s
#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.048s … 0.661s
#14 benchmarks composed for output. +1.777s … 2.438s
#15 return log +0.038s … 2.476s
Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q graphics card
Asus ROG Flow X13 in review: Gaming convertible with an AMD Ryzen 9 5980H and an optional RTX 3080
The Asus Flow X13 is an ultra-compact 13-inch convertible with a high-resolution display. With the optional display dock, equipped with an Nvidia Geforce RTX 30…
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | 13.40″ | 1.4 kg
Surface Book 3 13.5 review: Microsoft convertible is slowly getting old
With the latest edition of the Surface Book 3, Microsoft updates its multi-talented device to Intel’s Ice Lake generation. We get an overall picture of the i7 v…
Intel Core i7-1065G7 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | 13.50″ | 1.6 kg
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC in Review: Matte, powerful king of battery life
Asus has equipped the slim laptop with a four-core processor and a dedicated graphics card. The features are excellent otherwise as well: matte IPS screen, NVMe…
Intel Core i7-10510U | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | 15.60″ | 1.6 kg
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 laptop review: Comet Lake for content creators
The MSI Prestige 14 is a small powerhouse with a design and equipment that are convincing. We also like the keyboard with its normal-sized arrow keys very much….
Intel Core i7-10710U | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | 14.00″ | 1.3 kg
Lenovo IdeaPad S740-15IRH Laptop Review: Best and Priciest IdeaPad Yet
Although the IdeaPad name is commonly associated with inexpensive entry-level to mid-range offerings, the IdeaPad S740 is easily the most luxurious and powerful…
Intel Core i7-9750H | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | 15.60″ | 1.9 kg
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC: Intel Core i5-9300H, 15.60″, 1.8 kg
Review » MSI GF63 Thin 9SC Laptop Review: Lightweight gamer for just under $1000
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60″, 2 kg
Review » Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH Convertible Review: The XPS 15 2-in-1 Dell Should Have Made
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.30″, 1.5 kg
Review » Razer Blade Stealth (GTX 1650 Max-Q) Review: 4K screen, battery life & CPU performance disappoint
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC: Intel Core i7-10710U, 15.60″, 1.7 kg
Review » MSI Prestige 15 A10SC Laptop Review: One of the Best Dell XPS 15 Alternatives
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE: Intel Core i7-8565U, 15.60″, 1.9 kg
Review » Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL Review: A great all-rounder with only one real weakness
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77: Intel Core i7-8565U, 15.60″, 1.7 kg
Review » Asus ZenBook 15 UX534F Laptop Review: Look Like an Ultrabook, Play Like a Gamer
MSI Prestige 14 i7-10710U: Intel Core i7-10710U, 14.00″, 1.3 kg
Review » MSI Prestige 14 Hands-On Laptop Review: Faster than ever and still great for content creators
MSI PS63 Modern 8SC: Intel Core i7-8565U, 15.60″, 1.7 kg
Review » A true all-rounder: MSI PS63 Modern 8SC Laptop in Review
MSI GV15 Thin 11SC-633: Intel Core i5-11400H, 15.60″, 1.9 kg
External Review » MSI GV15 Thin 11SC-633
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R6BZ: AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, 14.00″, 1.5 kg
External Review » Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R6BZ
Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R9Q5: AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, 14.00″, 1.5 kg
External Review » Acer Swift X SFX14-41G-R9Q5
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH-K6069T: AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS, 13.40″, 1.3 kg
External Review » Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH-K6069T
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX535LH-BN150T : Intel Core i7-10870H, 15.60″, 1.8 kg
External Review » Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX535LH-BN150T
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX535LH-BN024T: Intel Core i5-10300H, 15.60″, 1.8 kg
External Review » Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX535LH-BN024T
Lenovo ThinkBook 15p IMH-20V30007GE: Intel Core i5-10300H, 15.60″, 1.9 kg
External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 15p IMH-20V30007GE
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX564PH-EZ007R: Intel Core i7-11370H, 15.60″, 1.9 kg
External Review » Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX564PH-EZ007R
MSI GF63 Thin 10SC-206: Intel Core i5-10300H, 15.60″, 1.9 kg
External Review » MSI GF63 Thin 10SC-206
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH-K6034T-BE: AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS, 13.40″, 1.3 kg
External Review » Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH-K6034T-BE
MSI Prestige 15 A11SCX-019XES: Intel Core i7-1185G7, 15.60″, 1.7 kg
External Review » MSI Prestige 15 A11SCX-019XES
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC-014: Intel Core i7-10710U, 15.60″, 1.7 kg
External Review » MSI Prestige 15 A10SC-014
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH: AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS, 13.40″, 1.4 kg
External Review » Asus ROG Flow X13 GV301QH
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20QV000WGE: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60″, 1.7 kg
External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20QV000WGE
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.50″, 1.6 kg
External Review » Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009: Intel Core i7-10710U, 14.00″, 1.3 kg
External Review » MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G2-20QV000KUS: Intel Core i7-9850H, 15.60″, 1.8 kg
External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G2-20QV000KUS
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7, GTX 1650 Max-Q: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.30″, 1.5 kg
External Review » Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7, GTX 1650 Max-Q
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G2-20QV00CEGE: Intel Core i9-9880H, 15.60″, 1.8 kg
External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G2-20QV00CEGE
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G2-20QV00CMGE: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60″, 1.7 kg
External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G2-20QV00CMGE
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60″, 2 kg
External Review » Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC-029NL: Intel Core i7-10710U, 15.60″, 1.6 kg
External Review » MSI Prestige 15 A10SC-029NL
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC-044XES: Intel Core i7-10710U, 15.60″, 1.7 kg
External Review » MSI Prestige 15 A10SC-044XES
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-004NL: Intel Core i7-10710U, 14.00″, 1.3 kg
External Review » MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-004NL
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC-060XES: Intel Core i7-10710U, 15.60″, 1.7 kg
External Review » MSI Prestige 15 A10SC-060XES
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G2-20QV000UGE: Intel Core i5-9300H, 15.60″, 1.7 kg
External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G2-20QV000UGE
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77: Intel Core i7-8565U, 15.60″, 1.7 kg
External Review » Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8078R: Intel Core i7-10510U, 15.60″, 1.7 kg
External Review » Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8078R
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC: Intel Core i7-10710U, 15.60″, 1.7 kg
External Review » MSI Prestige 15 A10SC
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-A8145T: Intel Core i7-8565U, 15.60″, 1.7 kg
External Review » Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-A8145T
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC-011: Intel Core i7-10710U, 15.60″, 1.6 kg
External Review » MSI Prestige 15 A10SC-011
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G2-20QV000WGE: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60″, 1.7 kg
External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G2-20QV000WGE
MSI GF63 9SC-662: Intel Core i5-9300H, 15.60″, 1.9 kg
External Review » MSI GF63 9SC-662
MSI Prestige 14 i7-10710U: Intel Core i7-10710U, 14.00″, 1.3 kg
External Review » MSI Prestige 14 i7-10710U
Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IWL 81SW001SMH: Intel Core i5-8265U, 15.60″, 1.8 kg
External Review » Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IWL 81SW001SMH
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC-039XES: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60″, 2.2 kg
External Review » MSI GF75 Thin 9SC-039XES
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT, i7-8565U: Intel Core i7-8565U, 15.60″, 1.7 kg
External Review » Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT, i7-8565U
MSI PS63 8SC-003NL: Intel Core i7-8565U, 15.60″, 1.6 kg
External Review » MSI PS63 8SC-003NL
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 13.50″, 1.6 kg
» Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5: Is it worth switching from the previous model?
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T: Intel Core i7-10510U, 15.60″, 1.6 kg
» A matte screen suits the Zenbook – Asus Zenbook 15 UX534FTC in review
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009: Intel Core i7-10710U, 14.00″, 1.3 kg
» MSI Prestige 14: Compactly-packed performance
No comments: